In Episode 20 of the Critical Moves Podcast, Al, Nuno, and Tim dive into the long-standing debate: which is more important in strategy games—single-player or multiplayer? The team explores everything from player preferences and commercial success to game longevity and the role of toxicity in online communities. With a mix of perspectives, this episode offers an insightful look at the pros and cons of both modes and discusses how they influence the future of strategy gaming.
Single-Player: The Backbone of Strategy Gaming. Al and Nuno argue that single-player is crucial for commercial success, with data showing that over 80% of players prefer single-player content. Even multiplayer-focused games like Supreme Commander gained traction through strong single-player campaigns first.
Multiplayer: Longevity and Community. Tim defends multiplayer as the key to a game's long-term success. Games like Beyond All Reason and Company of Heroes have remained popular due to player-driven multiplayer modes that keep the community alive.
Toxicity and the Multiplayer Experience. The team discusses how toxicity in multiplayer communities can drive players away, with Al highlighting the negative effects and Tim advocating for a balanced, welcoming environment.
Can Strategy Games Have the Best of Both Worlds? The episode concludes with a discussion on balancing both single-player and multiplayer. While some games have succeeded in this, the team agrees that it’s a rare achievement, particularly for indie developers with limited resources.
Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or Amazon Music. Or search Critical Moves Podcast on your preferred podcast platform.




Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or Amazon Music. Or search Critical Moves Podcast on your preferred podcast platform.